|

|
The cravat that later became fashionable
in England and France (see left) was more fanciful than that worn
by Croatian soldiers, however. In these countries, the cravat evolved
into a large, lacy bow with ends that hung several inches below
the chin (referred to by some as a towel). Sometimes instead
of a bow, the long ends of the fabric were tied with special cravat
tassels.
The steinkirk
became fashionable in the 1690s and it, too, was inspired by military
attire—in this case, the Battle of Steenkirk in Flanders in 1692.
It was characterized by a very long (six feet or so) piece of muslin
or linen with fringed or lacy ends. It was tied loosely at the neck
and then tucked into a buttonhole.
Left:
A typical example of the lacy cravat worn in England in the late
17th century (author's illus.)
|
| The stock
(right) was a neckwear undergarment of sorts. It was a piece of fabric
that tied at the back of the neck and had two horizontal slits in
front. Through these slits a long neckcloth was pulled and the ends
gently draped down the chest. |

Above:
The stock, a neckwear undergarment containing two slits through
which a long, decorative piece of fabric was threaded (author's
illus.).
|
|
Numerous iterations of cravats, stocks,
steinkirks and bands, accompanied by an endless array of accessories
for fastening them (such as buckles, pins and cords), followed in
succeeding centuries. In 1818, an essay on ties titled Neckclothitania
featured a frontispiece with cravats tied in different manners.
Some of the names of the knots include: "Mathematical," "Gordian,"
"Ball Room," and "Maharatta" (Hart, 42).
Although business casual wear has
cut into the tie's popularity, for some the tie remains a quaint
relic of fashion history. For many men (and some women) the tie
is worn proudly as a colorful expression of political affiliation,
school spirit, a favorite hobby or musical taste. Some (Flugel 1969
[1930]; Edwards 1997) have even suggested that it's a phallic symbol—an
extension of (or perhaps a substitute for!) one's virility and masculinity.
Regardless of its symbolic meaning, to an otherwise drab, gray uniform,
the necktie simply adds panache and personality. No wonder it has
survived so long.
Bibliography:
- "All About Ties: A Common Thread
Over Time." Ralph Marlin & Company. <http://www.ralphmarlin.com/all_about/timeline/main_copy.html>
(2 March 2001).
-Binder, Pearl. The Peacock's
Tail. London: George G. Harrap & Co. Ltd., 1958.
-Boucher, François. 20,000 Years of Fashion. New York: Harry
N. Abrams, Inc., 1987 [1965]. -"Croatia: History of the Cravat."
Croata. <http://www.croata.hr/en/hystory.htm>
(2 March 2001).
-Edwards, Tim. Men in the Mirror. London: Cassell, 1997.
-Flugel, J.C. The Psychology of Clothes. New York: International
Universitites Press, Inc., 1969 [1930].
-Hart, Avril. Ties. New York: Costume & Fashion Press, 1998.
-Laver, James. Costume & Fashion. New York: Thames & Hudson,
Inc., 1995 [1969].
|