|
Because pale skin was perhaps the
most important beauty attribute in western society for hundreds
of years (the racial implications of this fashion have not gone
unnoticed!), dark hair was coveted for its ability to emphasize
this pallor better than blond hair. Other popular beauty rituals
included wearing gloves perfumed with cloves, rose water and musk,
as well as the wearing of face-patches. An interesting variation
of the tattoo, patches in the shapes of hearts, stars, moons were
placed around the face to draw attention to (or to conceal) certain
features. The location of these patches conveyed a language all
their own. A patch near the lip was called a coquette, meaning
that its wearer was flirtatious. A heart-shaped patch on left cheek
indicated that the wearer was engaged; a patch in corner of the
eye was called la passionée, and conveyed the wearer’s joie
de vivre.
During the 19th century, two schools
of thought on cosmetics emerged—one that promoted their use as a
positive means of correcting nature’s deficiencies, and another
that touted cosmetics as immoral instruments of sin and deception.
Mrs. H.R. Haweis, the author of two books, The Art of Beauty
(1878) and The Art of Dress (1879), was quite open in her
advocacy of cosmetics. Though a firm supporter of beauty of character,
she also supported the cultivation of physical beauty, and believed
that the two need not be mutually exclusive: “The culture of beauty
need never interfere with that of goodness and usefulness to others.”
In other words, a little lipstick never hurt anybody! And yet others,
such as the writers of Godey’s Lady’s Book (a Philadelphia
publication from the mid-19th c.) advocated “moral cosmetics,” such
as a good night’s sleep and the avoidance of card-playing, drinking
and smoking.
Now, in the (very) late 20th century,
it appears cosmetic use is here to stay, as women and men continue
to right nature’s "wrongs," or enhance nature’s gifts.
And not just in Europe and North America, either. Cosmetic use can
be found all over the world, in all variety of forms by all variety
of people.
October 15, 1999
Bibliography:
Boucher, Francois, 20,000 Years
of Fashion: The History of Costume and Personal Adornment Harry
N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers, New York, 1965.
Corson, Richard, Fashions In Makeup, Peter Owen, London,
1972.
Gregor, Joseph, Wiener Szenische
Kunst, Band II, Das Bühnenkostum in Historischer, Aesthetischer
und Psychologischer Anaylse, Amalthea-Verlag, Zurich, 1925.
Marwick, Arthur, Beauty in History--Society,
Politics and Personal Appearance, c. 1500 to the Present, Thames
and Republic, London, 1988.
Morris, Desmond, The Naked Ape,
Dell Publishing Co., New York, 1967.
Ragas, Meg Cohen & Kozlowski,
Karen, Read My Lips: A Cultural History of Lipstick, Chronicle
Books, San Francisco, 1998.
Robinson, Julian, The Quest for
Human Beauty: An Illustrated History, W.W. Norton & Company,
Inc., New York, 1998.
Steele, Valerie, Fashion and Eroticism:
Ideals of Feminine Beauty from the Victorian Era to the Jazz Age,
Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.
Steele, Valerie, Paris Fashion,
A Cultural History, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
von Boehn, Max, Die Mode: Menschen
und Moden im 17. Jahrhundert, F. Bruckmann A.-G., Munich, 1913.
The Art Book, Phaidon Press
Ltd., London, 1994.
Photo Credits:
(1) Gregor, Joseph, Wiener Szenische
Kunst, Band II, Das Bühnenkostum in Historischer, Aesthetischer
und Psychologischer Anaylse, "A.D. Bertoli: Figurine. Tuschzeichnung,"
plate 103.
(2) von Boehn, Max, Die Mode: Menschen
und Moden im 17. Jahrhundert, "Crispin de Passe, Konigen Elisabeth
von England," title page
|